<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anti toddler-hoon legislation claims its first scalp</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boxcutters.net/2007/02/23/anti-toddler-hoon-legislation-claims-its-first-scalp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boxcutters.net/2007/02/23/anti-toddler-hoon-legislation-claims-its-first-scalp/</link>
	<description>It&#039;s Television: Dissected</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:15:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: kerrie</title>
		<link>http://boxcutters.net/2007/02/23/anti-toddler-hoon-legislation-claims-its-first-scalp/#comment-1860</link>
		<dc:creator>kerrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 11:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boxcutters.net/blog/index.php/?p=315#comment-1860</guid>
		<description>I agree: ridiculous. Has there been a rash of toddlers driving cars and surfing recently? Kids watch all kinds of fanciful/fantasy stuff on TV. If some TV character flies, hordes of small children aren&#039;t going to suddenly jump off the garage roof - particularly if they have no way of getting up there in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree: ridiculous. Has there been a rash of toddlers driving cars and surfing recently? Kids watch all kinds of fanciful/fantasy stuff on TV. If some TV character flies, hordes of small children aren&#8217;t going to suddenly jump off the garage roof &#8211; particularly if they have no way of getting up there in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://boxcutters.net/2007/02/23/anti-toddler-hoon-legislation-claims-its-first-scalp/#comment-1841</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boxcutters.net/blog/index.php/?p=315#comment-1841</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to hear more about the &#039;effects&#039; model (although this is perhaps not the time or place - maybe I can enrole in one of your classes). Just knowing from Fry who is one and a half is pretty much all monkey see monkey do at this point.

But  obviously he would never take off in the car and banning this ad is absolutely ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to hear more about the &#8216;effects&#8217; model (although this is perhaps not the time or place &#8211; maybe I can enrole in one of your classes). Just knowing from Fry who is one and a half is pretty much all monkey see monkey do at this point.</p>
<p>But  obviously he would never take off in the car and banning this ad is absolutely ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fourthof5</title>
		<link>http://boxcutters.net/2007/02/23/anti-toddler-hoon-legislation-claims-its-first-scalp/#comment-1828</link>
		<dc:creator>fourthof5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 04:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boxcutters.net/blog/index.php/?p=315#comment-1828</guid>
		<description>[rant]
Jesus that shits me. I spend 90% of my time teaching telling people that the &quot;effects&quot; model is crap. That hey have to go beyond the idea of monkey see monkey do. And STILL this crap keeps rearing its ugly head. 
[/rant]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[rant]<br />
Jesus that shits me. I spend 90% of my time teaching telling people that the &#8220;effects&#8221; model is crap. That hey have to go beyond the idea of monkey see monkey do. And STILL this crap keeps rearing its ugly head.<br />
[/rant]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://boxcutters.net/2007/02/23/anti-toddler-hoon-legislation-claims-its-first-scalp/#comment-1796</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 07:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boxcutters.net/blog/index.php/?p=315#comment-1796</guid>
		<description>Little kids are climbing out of cots everywhere as soon as they can. Generally, friends of mine who have gone through that stage take it as an indication that it&#039;s time they move into a big-boy/girl bed.

I don&#039;t think there&#039;s that much CGI in there - apart from the obvious surfing bits and sitting up on the bonnet at the end. 

Other criticism I&#039;ve heard over the day is that kids that are a little older will get ideas from the ad - say 10 year olds.

It&#039;s a little nanny-state-ish though - because parents don&#039;t take responsibility for what their kids watch nobody&#039;s allowed to see it. I find this ad much less offensive than some of the SUV ads that went to air during the superbowl with the great big tank of a 4x4 driving up a big metal see-saw and skidding to a stop millimetres from a gorge with a drop of hundreds of metres. 

There&#039;s a general nanny-state movement in this country at the moment, such as with the proposal that all of the Australian internet be filtered of any porn, which will have a massive effect on the speed of internet on all sites all over the country.

I&#039;m not outraged by the censorship of the ad - it&#039;s just an ad - but it&#039;s symbolic of trends in many aspects of life in this country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Little kids are climbing out of cots everywhere as soon as they can. Generally, friends of mine who have gone through that stage take it as an indication that it&#8217;s time they move into a big-boy/girl bed.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s that much CGI in there &#8211; apart from the obvious surfing bits and sitting up on the bonnet at the end. </p>
<p>Other criticism I&#8217;ve heard over the day is that kids that are a little older will get ideas from the ad &#8211; say 10 year olds.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a little nanny-state-ish though &#8211; because parents don&#8217;t take responsibility for what their kids watch nobody&#8217;s allowed to see it. I find this ad much less offensive than some of the SUV ads that went to air during the superbowl with the great big tank of a 4&#215;4 driving up a big metal see-saw and skidding to a stop millimetres from a gorge with a drop of hundreds of metres. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s a general nanny-state movement in this country at the moment, such as with the proposal that all of the Australian internet be filtered of any porn, which will have a massive effect on the speed of internet on all sites all over the country.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not outraged by the censorship of the ad &#8211; it&#8217;s just an ad &#8211; but it&#8217;s symbolic of trends in many aspects of life in this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catbrain</title>
		<link>http://boxcutters.net/2007/02/23/anti-toddler-hoon-legislation-claims-its-first-scalp/#comment-1791</link>
		<dc:creator>catbrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 06:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boxcutters.net/blog/index.php/?p=315#comment-1791</guid>
		<description>Playing that ad in the office earlier today provoked a bit of discussion...

* The editing and CGI makes it a bit too &quot;real&quot;;
* The biggest concern was the kid climbing out of the cot at the start, particularly one mother who said she&#039;s certain her child would immediately try to imitate it if he saw it; and
* Just because little kids &quot;should&quot; be in bed by 8.30pm doesn&#039;t necessarily mean that they are, for whatever reason.

Can we lobby to have those god-awful APIA ads banned too?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Playing that ad in the office earlier today provoked a bit of discussion&#8230;</p>
<p>* The editing and CGI makes it a bit too &#8220;real&#8221;;<br />
* The biggest concern was the kid climbing out of the cot at the start, particularly one mother who said she&#8217;s certain her child would immediately try to imitate it if he saw it; and<br />
* Just because little kids &#8220;should&#8221; be in bed by 8.30pm doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean that they are, for whatever reason.</p>
<p>Can we lobby to have those god-awful APIA ads banned too?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

