Comments on: Futurama Update http://boxcutters.net/2007/03/17/futurama-update/ It's Television: Dissected Tue, 15 May 2012 01:41:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Nigel P http://boxcutters.net/2007/03/17/futurama-update/#comment-1924 Nigel P Fri, 23 Mar 2007 04:32:09 +0000 http://boxcutters.net/blog/index.php/?p=331#comment-1924 I wonder if Channel 10 will end up showing it. They probably will because it will be avaliable on DVD before it can be screened (just like Battlestar Galactica). I wonder if Channel 10 will end up showing it. They probably will because it will be avaliable on DVD before it can be screened (just like Battlestar Galactica).

]]> By: dishy http://boxcutters.net/2007/03/17/futurama-update/#comment-1909 dishy Sun, 18 Mar 2007 09:46:48 +0000 http://boxcutters.net/blog/index.php/?p=331#comment-1909 That there will be a new <em>Futurama</em> is the best news the universe has ever heard this millenium. Who cares if it's direct-to-DVD? TV sucks. DVD is the better medium. The real WTF is - why does the iF magazine interview have the name of every TV show in bold? And why is the text formatted like a monkey on crack wrote it? TV does suck, but website "designers" suck even more. That there will be a new Futurama is the best news the universe has ever heard this millenium. Who cares if it’s direct-to-DVD? TV sucks. DVD is the better medium.

The real WTF is – why does the iF magazine interview have the name of every TV show in bold? And why is the text formatted like a monkey on crack wrote it?

TV does suck, but website “designers” suck even more.

]]>