<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Cynical Attempt by Nine?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boxcutters.net/2007/03/31/a-cynical-attempt-by-nine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boxcutters.net/2007/03/31/a-cynical-attempt-by-nine/</link>
	<description>It&#039;s Television: Dissected</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:32:55 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: catbrain</title>
		<link>http://boxcutters.net/2007/03/31/a-cynical-attempt-by-nine/comment-page-1/#comment-1956</link>
		<dc:creator>catbrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 08:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boxcutters.net/blog/index.php/?p=337#comment-1956</guid>
		<description>And after all that, it turns out that it doesn&#039;t really matter if Nine were desperately chasing ratings or not:  Sunday was the first day of the ratings break for Easter and Nine was showing a repeat of &lt;i&gt;CSI&lt;/i&gt; anyway.  Perhaps they were just up to their usual trick of treating what little audience they have left with contempt.  

There wasn&#039;t much else worth watching last night, so we tuned in to &lt;i&gt;Rove&lt;/i&gt; - nice work at the swimming - very meta!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And after all that, it turns out that it doesn&#8217;t really matter if Nine were desperately chasing ratings or not:  Sunday was the first day of the ratings break for Easter and Nine was showing a repeat of <i>CSI</i> anyway.  Perhaps they were just up to their usual trick of treating what little audience they have left with contempt.  </p>
<p>There wasn&#8217;t much else worth watching last night, so we tuned in to <i>Rove</i> &#8211; nice work at the swimming &#8211; very meta!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catbrain</title>
		<link>http://boxcutters.net/2007/03/31/a-cynical-attempt-by-nine/comment-page-1/#comment-1949</link>
		<dc:creator>catbrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 10:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boxcutters.net/blog/index.php/?p=337#comment-1949</guid>
		<description>Of course, it would also be sweet to see it backfire on Nine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, it would also be sweet to see it backfire on Nine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catbrain</title>
		<link>http://boxcutters.net/2007/03/31/a-cynical-attempt-by-nine/comment-page-1/#comment-1948</link>
		<dc:creator>catbrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 10:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boxcutters.net/blog/index.php/?p=337#comment-1948</guid>
		<description>Josh, perhaps you&#039;re upset by this because of your relationship with Roving Enterprises... I think this is a very smart move by Nine - why not take advantage?  You always say that it&#039;s all about the ratings, and Nine know damn well what a good number of viewers will be watching at 8.30pm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh, perhaps you&#8217;re upset by this because of your relationship with Roving Enterprises&#8230; I think this is a very smart move by Nine &#8211; why not take advantage?  You always say that it&#8217;s all about the ratings, and Nine know damn well what a good number of viewers will be watching at 8.30pm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
