<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Freeview launches new campaign: More for free but at what cost?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boxcutters.net/2009/04/27/freeview-launches-new-campaign-more-for-free-but-at-what-cost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boxcutters.net/2009/04/27/freeview-launches-new-campaign-more-for-free-but-at-what-cost/</link>
	<description>It&#039;s Television: Dissected</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:59:22 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vzzzbx</title>
		<link>http://boxcutters.net/2009/04/27/freeview-launches-new-campaign-more-for-free-but-at-what-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-82053</link>
		<dc:creator>Vzzzbx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boxcutters.net/blog/?p=738#comment-82053</guid>
		<description>The ad will fool most people, sadly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Simply put: the networks&#039; customers (the advertisers) are set to directly benefit, and their consumers (the viewers who think they&#039;re customers) are just being herded into barns.  That&#039;s it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In making up the number of channels forthcoming and omitting vital facts, e.g. Freeview-branded recorders will restrict ad-skipping, they&#039;re fooling the ignorant masses into buying their official Freeview crippleware.  By the time the punters realise they&#039;ve been had, they&#039;ve already spent their money and it&#039;s too late to do anything about it.  (The ad, then, is extremely well-targeted because chucking together a load of 60-year-old IMT clips and &#039;reality&#039; winners appeals to the sentimentality of exactly the kind of person who&#039;s easily fooled by this sort of thing.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Meanwhile, the advertisers are happily sedated, safe in the knowledge that increasing numbers of victims I mean people are basically forced to sit through their shrill shouty nonsense about end-of-model run-outs and dirt cheap books and yoghurt.  The networks are happy, the public is disillusioned but continues to watch, life proceeds as normal until IPTV appears and confuses everybody all over again.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, and as if everything else about Freeview isn&#039;t bad enough, &#039;for free&#039; is just about the most egregious abuse of English I have ever seen in a slogan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ad will fool most people, sadly.</p>
<p>Simply put: the networks&#39; customers (the advertisers) are set to directly benefit, and their consumers (the viewers who think they&#39;re customers) are just being herded into barns.  That&#39;s it.</p>
<p>In making up the number of channels forthcoming and omitting vital facts, e.g. Freeview-branded recorders will restrict ad-skipping, they&#39;re fooling the ignorant masses into buying their official Freeview crippleware.  By the time the punters realise they&#39;ve been had, they&#39;ve already spent their money and it&#39;s too late to do anything about it.  (The ad, then, is extremely well-targeted because chucking together a load of 60-year-old IMT clips and &#39;reality&#39; winners appeals to the sentimentality of exactly the kind of person who&#39;s easily fooled by this sort of thing.)</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the advertisers are happily sedated, safe in the knowledge that increasing numbers of victims I mean people are basically forced to sit through their shrill shouty nonsense about end-of-model run-outs and dirt cheap books and yoghurt.  The networks are happy, the public is disillusioned but continues to watch, life proceeds as normal until IPTV appears and confuses everybody all over again.</p>
<p>Oh, and as if everything else about Freeview isn&#39;t bad enough, &#39;for free&#39; is just about the most egregious abuse of English I have ever seen in a slogan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vzzzbx</title>
		<link>http://boxcutters.net/2009/04/27/freeview-launches-new-campaign-more-for-free-but-at-what-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-80931</link>
		<dc:creator>Vzzzbx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 03:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boxcutters.net/blog/?p=738#comment-80931</guid>
		<description>The ad will fool most people, sadly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Simply put: the networks&#039; customers (the advertisers) are set to directly benefit, and their consumers (the viewers who think they&#039;re customers) are just being herded into barns.  That&#039;s it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In making up the number of channels forthcoming and omitting vital facts, e.g. Freeview-branded recorders will restrict ad-skipping, they&#039;re fooling the ignorant masses into buying their official Freeview crippleware.  By the time the punters realise they&#039;ve been had, they&#039;ve already spent their money and it&#039;s too late to do anything about it.  (The ad, then, is extremely well-targeted because chucking together a load of 60-year-old IMT clips and &#039;reality&#039; winners appeals to the sentimentality of exactly the kind of person who&#039;s easily fooled by this sort of thing.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Meanwhile, the advertisers are happily sedated, safe in the knowledge that increasing numbers of victims I mean people are basically forced to sit through their shrill shouty nonsense about end-of-model run-outs and dirt cheap books and yoghurt.  The networks are happy, the public is disillusioned but continues to watch, life proceeds as normal until IPTV appears and confuses everybody all over again.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, and as if everything else about Freeview isn&#039;t bad enough, &#039;for free&#039; is just about the most egregious abuse of English I have ever seen in a slogan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ad will fool most people, sadly.</p>
<p>Simply put: the networks&#39; customers (the advertisers) are set to directly benefit, and their consumers (the viewers who think they&#39;re customers) are just being herded into barns.  That&#39;s it.</p>
<p>In making up the number of channels forthcoming and omitting vital facts, e.g. Freeview-branded recorders will restrict ad-skipping, they&#39;re fooling the ignorant masses into buying their official Freeview crippleware.  By the time the punters realise they&#39;ve been had, they&#39;ve already spent their money and it&#39;s too late to do anything about it.  (The ad, then, is extremely well-targeted because chucking together a load of 60-year-old IMT clips and &#39;reality&#39; winners appeals to the sentimentality of exactly the kind of person who&#39;s easily fooled by this sort of thing.)</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the advertisers are happily sedated, safe in the knowledge that increasing numbers of victims I mean people are basically forced to sit through their shrill shouty nonsense about end-of-model run-outs and dirt cheap books and yoghurt.  The networks are happy, the public is disillusioned but continues to watch, life proceeds as normal until IPTV appears and confuses everybody all over again.</p>
<p>Oh, and as if everything else about Freeview isn&#39;t bad enough, &#39;for free&#39; is just about the most egregious abuse of English I have ever seen in a slogan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Wilson</title>
		<link>http://boxcutters.net/2009/04/27/freeview-launches-new-campaign-more-for-free-but-at-what-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-80919</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 07:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boxcutters.net/blog/?p=738#comment-80919</guid>
		<description>SMH and the Green Guide ran an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.smh.com.au/news/digital-life/home-entertainment/articles/freeview-in-a-fog/2009/04/08/1238869977974.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap2&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;article on Freeview&lt;/a&gt; in April:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;Many devices carrying the Freeview logo will not be compatible with upcoming Freeview services [...] Such features may be launched by the end of the year, but manufacturers will not be required to indicate whether their Freeview-branded equipment is compatible with these [...] at least four will sell devices that do not support the new features. Several others remain unsure that their devices will be compatible.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SMH and the Green Guide ran an <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/news/digital-life/home-entertainment/articles/freeview-in-a-fog/2009/04/08/1238869977974.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap2" rel="nofollow">article on Freeview</a> in April:</p>
<blockquote><p>Many devices carrying the Freeview logo will not be compatible with upcoming Freeview services [...] Such features may be launched by the end of the year, but manufacturers will not be required to indicate whether their Freeview-branded equipment is compatible with these [...] at least four will sell devices that do not support the new features. Several others remain unsure that their devices will be compatible.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Richards</title>
		<link>http://boxcutters.net/2009/04/27/freeview-launches-new-campaign-more-for-free-but-at-what-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-80911</link>
		<dc:creator>John Richards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 04:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boxcutters.net/blog/?p=738#comment-80911</guid>
		<description>&quot;switch&quot; to freeview? What an odd choice of term. Still, if I get the Moon Landing/Mr Squiggle Channel it&#039;ll be worth it... (that&#039;s ABC Moon).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;switch&#8221; to freeview? What an odd choice of term. Still, if I get the Moon Landing/Mr Squiggle Channel it&#39;ll be worth it&#8230; (that&#39;s ABC Moon).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Kinal</title>
		<link>http://boxcutters.net/2009/04/27/freeview-launches-new-campaign-more-for-free-but-at-what-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-80910</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Kinal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 04:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boxcutters.net/blog/?p=738#comment-80910</guid>
		<description>Fantastic, keep them coming. Does anybody think Freeview is fooling anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic, keep them coming. Does anybody think Freeview is fooling anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveAA</title>
		<link>http://boxcutters.net/2009/04/27/freeview-launches-new-campaign-more-for-free-but-at-what-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-80909</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveAA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 03:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boxcutters.net/blog/?p=738#comment-80909</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s more like a lament for the old days of TV that was, you know, interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s more like a lament for the old days of TV that was, you know, interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Wilson</title>
		<link>http://boxcutters.net/2009/04/27/freeview-launches-new-campaign-more-for-free-but-at-what-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-80904</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boxcutters.net/blog/?p=738#comment-80904</guid>
		<description>More for free? The last campaign promised 15 channels, this campaign promises 10.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What&#039;s next, an autographed Kyle Sandilands fan card?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More for free? The last campaign promised 15 channels, this campaign promises 10.</p>
<p>What&#39;s next, an autographed Kyle Sandilands fan card?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook User</title>
		<link>http://boxcutters.net/2009/04/27/freeview-launches-new-campaign-more-for-free-but-at-what-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-80903</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boxcutters.net/blog/?p=738#comment-80903</guid>
		<description>yeah, or a Channel Nine News promo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, or a Channel Nine News promo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Lutchner</title>
		<link>http://boxcutters.net/2009/04/27/freeview-launches-new-campaign-more-for-free-but-at-what-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-80899</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Lutchner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boxcutters.net/blog/?p=738#comment-80899</guid>
		<description>Wow. It looks like a real bad episode of 20 to 1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. It looks like a real bad episode of 20 to 1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
