<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Boxcutters &#187; multichanneling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boxcutters.net/tag/multichanneling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boxcutters.net</link>
	<description>It&#039;s Television: Dissected</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 02:37:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>SBSTWO launches tonight</title>
		<link>http://boxcutters.net/2009/06/01/sbstwo-launches-tonight/</link>
		<comments>http://boxcutters.net/2009/06/01/sbstwo-launches-tonight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 02:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Kinal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multichanneling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[promos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redundancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SBSTWO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boxcutters.net/blog/?p=806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SBSTWO launches tonight. In case you haven&#8217;t seen it, here&#8217;s the promo they&#8217;ve been running: At least they&#8217;re not lying about what it&#8217;s going to be. More of the same. How does a television network that is already supposed to be fulfilling a special need, provide more specialised content? Considering the recent criticism of SBS&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SBSTWO launches tonight. In case you haven&#8217;t seen it, here&#8217;s the promo they&#8217;ve been running:<br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Pyp4PGZDAQE&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Pyp4PGZDAQE&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br />
At least they&#8217;re not lying about what it&#8217;s going to be. More of the same. How does a television network that is already supposed to be fulfilling a special need, provide more specialised content?<br />
Considering the recent criticism of SBS&#8217;s new direction, perhaps SBSTWO will be the channel we all expected SBS 1 to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boxcutters.net/2009/06/01/sbstwo-launches-tonight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

