<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Boxcutters &#187; pay tv</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boxcutters.net/tag/pay-tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boxcutters.net</link>
	<description>It&#039;s Television: Dissected</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:33:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Ep 276: cloudstreet</title>
		<link>http://boxcutters.net/2011/08/23/episode276/</link>
		<comments>http://boxcutters.net/2011/08/23/episode276/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 13:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Kinal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abc breakfast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel 10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foxtel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how we watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pay tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[showcase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Showtime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pressgiant.net/boxcutters/?p=2860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is <a href="http://www.showtime.com.au/cloudstreet/" title="Home - Tim Winton's - cloudstreet"><em>cloudstreet</em></a> the best television drama creation to come out of Australia? Are David &#038; Margaret taking out a court order against John? All of these questions may be answered.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is <a href="http://www.showtime.com.au/cloudstreet/" title="Home - Tim Winton's - cloudstreet"><em>cloudstreet</em></a> the best television drama creation to come out of Australia or is it just another example of our reliance on nostalgia and bush magic to avoid truly reflecting our culture?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s quite possible that we answer that question in this week&#8217;s episode and there&#8217;s only one way to find out.</p>
<p>Also, John went to ACMI to (s)talk <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/atthemovies/" title="At the Movies - ABC TV">David &amp; Margaret</a>. He made a recording of his (s)talking and shares it with us.<br />
<span id="more-2860"></span></p>
<p>There&#8217;s more about <a href="http://boxcutters.net/tag/how-we-watch/"><strong>How We Watch</strong></a> and an absolutely great bit of <strong>Trotters</strong>.</p>
<h2 id="notes">Notes</h2>
<h3 id="one_thing">One Thing</h3>
<ul>
<li><em>The Brady Bunch</em>, &#8220;Kelly&#8217;s Kids&#8221; &ndash; 5:30pm Wed, 24 Aug 2011, <strong>Eleven</strong></li>
<li><a href="http://www.sbs.com.au/insight/" title="Insight with Jenny Brockie"><em>Insight</em></a>, &#8220;Tampa&#8221; &ndash; 7:30pm Tue, 23 Aug 2011, <strong>SBS ONE</strong> (repeated on SBS TWO on Friday)</li>
</ul>
<h3 id="can8217t_stop_the_serenity">Can&#8217;t Stop The <em>Serenity</em></h3>
<p>The Melbourne Browncoats host their annual charity event this Saturday. They promise &#8220;heaps of prizes to give away&#8221;&#8221; plus see <em>Serenity</em> and <em>Dr Horrible&#8217;s Sing-along Blog</em> on the big screen! Tix are <a href="https://www.dramatix.com.au/event/show/711" title="Buy Tickets Online">$18 online</a> or $20 at the door.</p>
<p>For more info, see the <a href="http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=149507875131320" title="Facebook">facebook page</a> or the <a href="http://www.newmelbournebrowncoats.com/" title="New Melbourne Browncoats, Inc.">Melbourne Browncoats wesbite</a>.</p>
<ul class="download-links" style="list-style: none; margin:0; padding:0;"> 
<li style="display:inline-block;margin-right:.5em;"><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Boxcutters/" ><img src="http://boxcutters.net/wp-content/themes/boxcutters2011/assets/child/i/icons/podcast-large-2.png" alt="Subscribe to Podcast RSS" title="Subscribe to Podcast RSS" /></a></li> 
<li style="display:inline-block;margin-right:.5em;"><a href="http://bit.ly/bcitunes" ><img src="http://boxcutters.net/wp-content/themes/boxcutters2011/assets/child/i/icons/itunes-large.png" alt="Download via iTunes" title="Download via iTunes" /></a></li> 
<li style="display:inline-block;margin-right:.5em;"><a href="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/bc.assets.sgiant.com/bc/podcast/BCep276a.mp3" ><img src="http://boxcutters.net/wp-content/themes/boxcutters2011/assets/child/i/icons/mp3-large.png" alt="Download MP3" title="Download MP3" /></a></li> 
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boxcutters.net/2011/08/23/episode276/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/bc.assets.sgiant.com/bc/podcast/BCep276a.mp3" length="30817112" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TV in HD, Please</title>
		<link>http://boxcutters.net/2011/08/02/tv-in-hd-please/</link>
		<comments>http://boxcutters.net/2011/08/02/tv-in-hd-please/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 07:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Peters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free-to-air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdtv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pay tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sdtv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sport]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pressgiant.net/boxcutters/?p=2751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Things look better in HD but it would be better if there were things to look at in HD.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>I want my. I want my TV in HD please.</h3>
<p>How good was <a href="http://www.sbs.com.au/tdf2011/stages-map/" title="Le Tour on SBS">that French bike race</a>? Cadel Evans, an introvert, so insular that he loves his team members because they leave him alone, only to speak to him if it&#8217;s &#8216;work related&#8217;, put his head down and won the three week European torture orgy. It was a win for the quiet nerd who&#8217;s happy to go the knuckle if you walk too close. Don&#8217;t believe me? Look up <a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=angry+cadel" title="&#x202a;angry cadel&#x202c;&rlm; - YouTube">“angry Cadel” on youtube</a>.</p>
<p>And when it comes to three week European torture orgies, the Tour de France is by far the prettiest. On my big fat and thin LED television (yeah, I&#8217;m proud to be an effluent suburban boy with his suburban toys and if you got a problem with that, I&#8217;m happy to arrange an after-school appointment outside the Glen Waverley station, knives optional), the French countryside is so gorgeous it makes me want to weep.</p>
<p>But it doesn&#8217;t. It only makes me angry.</p>
<p>Why? Because, right now, the Tour De France is the only sporting event broadcast in high definition on free to air television. Channel Ten dropped their One HD broadcasts of the footy when they lost the bidding war, Channel Seven uses their HD capacity for <em>Hogan&#8217;s Heroes</em> reruns and the ABC&#8217;s VFL and lawn bowl coverage is shot on Super 8.</p>
<p>I was at the MCG a couple weeks ago with mates, watching another game on one of the TVs in a bar at half time. Seven&#8217;s standard definition telecast was embarrassing: So pixellated you&#8217;d think we were watching the game on a Super Nintendo. One of my mates started hitting the TV thinking it was the reception, leaving me to explain to the security guard that the beer all over the screen was Kerry Stokes&#8217;s fault. This time, we were lucky. The security guard was similarly angry at the horribly pixellated coverage of a recent Rajasthan Royals cricket game. In the end we had to pull him back from, Michael Douglas <em>Falling Down</em> style, smashing all the TVs in the place.</p>
<p>We know why the channels serve us this pixellated rubbish. It&#8217;s because they prefer to use their share of a limited amount of spectrum/signal on more programming, looking to get a snare of the audience that doesn&#8217;t like footy with <em>Hogan&#8217;s Heroes</em> reruns, or in the ABC&#8217;s case, News 24. The <a href="http://bit.ly/rdai70" title="Digital TV | Will the future be crystal clear? | Lost | Royals wed"><em>Green Guide</em>&#8217;s Paul Kalina explains why</a> so much better than I can.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s interesting in Kalina&#8217;s article is the differing in opinions between ABC&#8217;s Kim Dalton who thinks the difference in broadcast quality is marginal and Foxtel&#8217;s Patrick Delany who told Kalina that 80% of new customers sign up to their HD service, so much so that they&#8217;ve stopped ordering SD set top boxes from their supplier. And they&#8217;re listening to their big television owning sports fan audience with many HD channels and a promise to play all games of AFL next year in HD.</p>
<p>And what annoys me most is the emptiness behind the bragging that has always come with sports broadcasting. Race Cam, Hawk Eye, Super Tedious Slo Mo, that ridiculous camera that buzzes above the players during an AFL finals game and 3D &ndash; none of us really care.</p>
<p>If you really care about your audience, open up your pocket, hire some HD cameras (last year&#8217;s Grand Final replay was shot in SD because all the cameras were double booked for the Commonwealth Games), and broadcast the game in HD. It&#8217;s not too much to ask.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll leave you with a bit from <a href="http://bit.ly/oA2Pdl" title="In sharp contrast - Entertainment - theage.com.au">an amusing article from 2007 proclaiming the exciting new era of HD TV</a>.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>“Besides spectacular vistas and shockingly real playing fields, hi-def clarity puts any and all wrinkles, pimples and pores on display in well-lit bathroom-mirror detail.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Hogaaaaan!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boxcutters.net/2011/08/02/tv-in-hd-please/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ep 272: Wilfred</title>
		<link>http://boxcutters.net/2011/07/26/episode272/</link>
		<comments>http://boxcutters.net/2011/07/26/episode272/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Kinal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[austar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foxtel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judith lucy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pay tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wilfred]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pressgiant.net/boxcutters/?p=2726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A review of the US version of Wilfred. Two questionable McDonald's ads. Foxtel v Austar discussion and news of Marvel live action TV series.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Usually when a USA network remakes a foreign series, it pales in comparison to the original. The <a href="http://www.nbc.com/the-office/">US&#8217;s version of <em>The Office</em></a> is clearly an exception to that rule, but what about <a href="http://www.fxnetworks.com//shows/originals/wilfred/">the new version of <em>Wilfred</em></a>? They&#8217;ve brought Jason Gann on board to play the title role, but how does it compare?</p>
<p>In <strong>I Don&#8217;t Buy It</strong>, Brett has problems with McDonald&#8217;s.</p>
<p><span id="more-2726"></span></p>
<h4>If You Watch One Thing</h4>
<ul>
<li><em>Judith Lucy&#8217;s Spiritual Journey</em>, 9:30pm 27 July, on ABC1</li>
<li><em>Guerilla Garderners</em>, 5pm Weekdays on One HD</li>
<li><em>Hot Docs: The Confessions</em>, 10pm Tuesday on SBS</li>
</ul>
<p>Also, you can catch up on the previous episodes of <a href="http://eleven.com.au/wilfred.htm"><em>Wilfred</em> on Eleven&#8217;s website</a>.</p>
<p>Double jeopardy laws are being reworked in Victoria. <a href="http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/more-news/victorias-double-jeopardy-laws-to-be-reworked/story-fn7x8me2-1226068708669">Brett was right.</a></p>
<p>Toby Halligan has provided us with more information about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_of_large_numbers">very large numbers</a> and information about <a href="http://www.talkingfooty.com/forums/viewpost.13433.html">the television popularity of AFL vs NRL</a>.</p>
<ul class="download-links" style="list-style: none; margin:0; padding:0;"> 
<li style="display:inline-block;margin-right:.5em;"><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Boxcutters/" ><img src="http://boxcutters.net/wp-content/themes/boxcutters2011/assets/child/i/icons/podcast-large-2.png" alt="Subscribe to Podcast RSS" title="Subscribe to Podcast RSS" /></a></li> 
<li style="display:inline-block;margin-right:.5em;"><a href="http://bit.ly/bcitunes" ><img src="http://boxcutters.net/wp-content/themes/boxcutters2011/assets/child/i/icons/itunes-large.png" alt="Download via iTunes" title="Download via iTunes" /></a></li> 
<li style="display:inline-block;margin-right:.5em;"><a href="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/bc.assets.sgiant.com/bc/podcast/BCep272.mp3" ><img src="http://boxcutters.net/wp-content/themes/boxcutters2011/assets/child/i/icons/mp3-large.png" alt="Download MP3" title="Download MP3" /></a></li> 
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boxcutters.net/2011/07/26/episode272/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/bc.assets.sgiant.com/bc/podcast/BCep272.mp3" length="35175586" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>:30 Seconds &#8212; A Rule of One review</title>
		<link>http://boxcutters.net/2009/09/17/30-seconds-a-rule-of-one-review/</link>
		<comments>http://boxcutters.net/2009/09/17/30-seconds-a-rule-of-one-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Kinal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[:30 Seconds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy Channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foxtel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outland Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pay tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule of one]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zapruder's other films]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boxcutters.net/blog/?p=1136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following took place as part of the Outland Institute radio show and our controversial &#8220;Rule of One&#8221; review process. Since this aired, last Friday, there has been another episode of :30 Seconds but the Rule of One prevails. Last Monday, the first episode of the new sitcom from Andrew Denton&#8217;s Zapruder&#8217;s Other Films aired [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The following took place as part of the <a href="http://outlandinstitute.wordpress.com/">Outland Institute</a> radio show and our controversial &#8220;Rule of One&#8221; review process. Since this aired, last Friday, there has been another episode of</em> :30 Seconds<em> but the Rule of One prevails.</em></p>
<p>Last Monday, the first episode of the new sitcom from Andrew Denton&#8217;s <a href="http://zaprudersotherfilms.com.au/">Zapruder&#8217;s Other Films</a> aired on the Comedy Channel.</p>
<p>Called <em>:30 Seconds</em> (complete with the colon), it&#8217;s about an advertising agency.</p>
<p>Yes, at the moment it seems like Zapruder&#8217;s is only coming out with shows about advertising. If you have a problem with that, <a href="http://zof.com.au/index.php?option=com_contact&#038;view=contact&#038;id=2&#038;Itemid=67">take it up with Denton</a>.</p>
<p>Comedy, as you well know, is a very sensitive lover. It requires caring, attention and tenderness.</p>
<p>To continue that already tortured analogy, the flowers and chocolate, the romance, if you will, are the acting and directing of a sitcom.</p>
<p>They make us feel like there might be something this relationship for us. We&#8217;re prepared to give it a chance and maybe allow a couple of dates.</p>
<p>The sex in the analogy that not even I can believe I&#8217;m taking this far, is the writing. It&#8217;s the writing that, BAM!, really drives home the idea that this comedy deserves a part of our lives.</p>
<p>As far as acting goes, <em>:30 Seconds</em> has the chops. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gyton_Grantley">Gyton Grantley</a>, <a href="http://www.redstitch.net/actors.aspx?type=0">Kat Stewart</a>, Peter O&#8217;Brien and Stephen Curry all bring their exquisite thespian skills to the set.</p>
<p>The glaring deficiency in the show is in the bedroom.  The writing just isn&#8217;t there. So often we see a sitcom where the jokes come forced, like the writers are squeezing in the jokes regardless of context.</p>
<p>The secret is to let the jokes come from the characters. Especially when an accomplished cast is at the writers&#8217; disposal, it the characters are good, the actors will find the comedy and the director will help bring it out.</p>
<p>The actors in <em>:30 Seconds</em> just don&#8217;t have enough to deal with.  The characters are one dimensional at best.</p>
<p>The potential is there for a great comedy but the writing needs to improve.</p>
<p>Also, the lighting is some of the worst I&#8217;ve seen outside YouTube.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boxcutters.net/2009/09/17/30-seconds-a-rule-of-one-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>fascinating TIVO developments</title>
		<link>http://boxcutters.net/2007/06/16/fascinating-tivo-developments/</link>
		<comments>http://boxcutters.net/2007/06/16/fascinating-tivo-developments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 23:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ross McQueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Channel 9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dvr/pvr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pay tv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boxcutters.net/blog/index.php/2007/06/16/fascinating-tivo-developments/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very interesting article about how Packer selling up his share in Nine will lead to the free to air networks finally taking on Foxtel as a whole. Maybe TIVO won&#8217;t as doomed as we first thought.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/news/business/drama-aplenty-on-foxtel-tivo/2007/06/15/1181414547016.html">article </a>about how Packer selling up his share in Nine will lead to the free to air networks finally taking on Foxtel as a whole.</p>
<p>Maybe TIVO won&#8217;t as doomed as we first thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boxcutters.net/2007/06/16/fascinating-tivo-developments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pay TV Statistics</title>
		<link>http://boxcutters.net/2007/03/02/pay-tv-statistics/</link>
		<comments>http://boxcutters.net/2007/03/02/pay-tv-statistics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 02:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bolden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pay tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ratings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boxcutters.net/blog/index.php/?p=324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read today that: &#8220;Last week, subscribers to pay TV spent 60 per cent of their viewing time on the multiple channels it offers, with free-to-air channels Seven, Nine, Ten, SBS and the ABC receiving just 40 per cent of their attention.&#8221; I thought that this was fairly interesting, there has been much discussion of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read today that:</p>
<p>&#8220;Last week, subscribers to pay TV spent 60 per cent of their viewing time on the multiple channels it offers, with free-to-air channels Seven, Nine, Ten, SBS and the ABC receiving just 40 per cent of their attention.&#8221;</p>
<p>I thought that this was fairly interesting, there has been much discussion of the &#8216;ratings war&#8217;, but not much on the numbers that Pay TV are getting.</p>
<p>I wonder what the breakdown is within Pay TV for the Channels. I will add, that I would think I watch closer to 80% Pay TV.</p>
<p>Obtained from a <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/realfooty/news/afl/pay-tv-footy-gets-kick-along-by-nine/2007/03/01/1172338794230.html">AFL Rights article at The Age.</a></p>
<p>Any thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boxcutters.net/2007/03/02/pay-tv-statistics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

